mercredi 26 août 2015

Reverse Racism at the downtown Seattle YMCA: What no one has the guts to say





Note:  This review, which originally dates from 2014, was removed from Yelp at the behest of the downtown YMCA or its proxies on August 26, 2015.

I have had to reconstruct it the best I can from memory.

In fact, three years' worth of updates, which contained observations as well as my concrete experiences at this business, were all removed without leaving a trace.

Prospective customers of a business such as a health club have the right to know about the racial/ethnic/religous/socio-economic composition of the membership--if it is "balanced."  Many of us do not want to go to a health club where foul or violent language are used or where there are security issues.


* * * * *

It has to be said that the downtown Seattle YMCA works exceedingly hard at removing one-star reviews (two removed within the past month) and at promoting the posting of new five-star reviews (two added within the past 24 hours).  And at aligning itself with the political establishment in Seattle.




There is a reason the YMCA has been losing members over the past 13 years since I joined in 2002.

(1) Major security issues.  Now on all three floors where members work out there are banks and banks of safe deposit lockers.   A very large proportion of the membership looks as if it is on welfare, has mental health issues, or has had problems with the law.

(2) The downtown YMCA does not reflect the actual racial composition of Seattle.  It is disproportionately African-American, perhaps 40%-50%.    Caucasians constitue 70% of the population, Asian-Americans 13%, African-Americans, 12%, and Hispanics.

When I first joined in 2002, it was about 80% Caucasian.

So there has been a demographic and a cultural shift.  Many people who are not racist at all are still not comfortable with people speaking very loudly ("bellyaching"), using foul or violent language, even though they are tolerant of things such as the presence of soul and hip-hop that dominate the popular music culture in this city.

(3)  As a racial minority, but not African-American, I experienced racial discrimination and social ostracization from those whites and blacks who seemed to have bonded together based on a common understanding ("Might is right," "whites have much to repentant over," "Blacks are heroic, white people are racist," etc.) and shared cultural/political values.

There is a reason David Brewster has been able to rent out the bottom two floors of the building to his new fledgling Athenaeum.

I had no reason to believe that non-African-American racial minorities would not cave in to the agenda of political correctness for reasons having more to do with expediency and gain than anything else.

The downtown Seattle YMCA is doing something very dishonest by pretending that it "looks like Seattle" and is upholding"diversity" all the while deliberately concealing the demographic shifts that has taken place since 2002.

It tolerates violence (* bullying *) and promotes racism all the while pretending it is doing the opposite.



Ah, but underneath...

A 13-year member of the downtown Y--me--spills the beans.  The high incidence of theft (especially locker break-ins) correlates with the bullying that I experienced here from several Y members and staff.

A health club is only as good as the staff and the members.

The following is an honest critique of major areas of concern I have had with this business.

(1) Cutting corners; lifeguard apathy

There have been lifeguards who decided that all along they have been "lenient" to swimmers who over the years swam up to the last minute before the posted ending of the lap session and that the rule all alone was that swimmers had to be out of the pool area before then.

I've been swimming in Seattle the last 20 years and have never had lifeguards decide that since they want to "get out of the joint real quick," they will get everybody out of the pool before it is scheduled to close (even if one of the lifeguards is supposed to be at the pool afterwards doing other things).

I've witnessed lifeguards shut down 25 minutes early because no was in the pool.

I was once screamed at big-time by a member (the resident Hannibal Lecter) for accidentally kicking him. The lifeguard, typically, did not intervene.

So I have complained, and occasionally something has been done.

This is what the current director called "bending over backwards time and time again to accomodate my special needs."    Plain weird.

(2) Tolerance of racial prejudice; ecnouragement of bullying

One of my shocking memories is taking an elevator with a fellow lap swimmer.  A lifeguard--a twenty-something African-American woman, and another staff person was in it as well.    The other swimmer, a Vietnamese-American, said "hello" to her, but she refused to acknowledge him and continued to talk to the other (white) staff person.

On the fifth floor, many white and black members form "buddy pairs" (with the African-American being the object of admiration, even adulation) and ostracize members of other races.  "What are you doing talking to me??"  They don't even see you.  They don't want to.

When I first started going to the donwtown Y in 200, it looked more like Seattle:  70% white, 10% Asian, 5% black.  Now it is closer to 40% white, 40% black, 12% Asian, 3% Hispanic.

If you think it is cool to be around African-Americans--and many, many people do--even ones on welfare or sketchy past histories, this gym might be an excellent fit for you.

African-Americans do seem to get special treatment.  In my observations over the past 13 years, the things that might land others in trouble don't often apply to them.

In fact, it seems like the bigger a person's physical stature, the more weight s/he can throw around and get away with.

Rumor has it that a director who expelled an African-American for exploding and going on a 15-minute tirade against a member who simply asked if he could work in on a machine (the guy had been doing reps on that one machine for 10+ minutes) was fired.

Rules are selectively enforced; staff is reluctant, understandably, to confront much bigger than themselves and also face charges of "racism."

If you are small, unassertive, and/or Asian and male, expect to be treated with less respect or even dumped on from low-level staff that find in you a valve for their frustrations.

(3) Major security issues

Rows and rows of sotrage lockers on all members floors:  regular lockers for cltohes, smaller deposit boxes fir valuables, medium-sized ones just for gym clothes, and still others for laptops on the main floor.  This, I guess, doesn't count the containers for needles in the dressing rooms.  It makes for a state of siege.

These improvements all occurred after they were brought in by the new director three years ago.
I was harassed repeatedly here, and all the staff could do the next time I went to report an incident was to say, "Oh, yeah, ANOTHER incident?!"

(4) Rules that change from week to week, sometimes even from day to day

Rules are posted for a week, sometimes longer, then are taken down and replaced by new notices.  No one seems to have the same udnerstanding of what "the" rules are.  The useful plaques reminding memers to allow others to work in on machines were ienxytivsnly taken down a few years ago.  Most members don't even know what the rules are and many wouldn't care even if they did.

(5) No water/energy conservation.   Some members take half a dozen towels or more.  There used to be notices encouraging water conservation.  They were posted for three weeks, then taken down.

THE GOOD

(1) There are some nice staff here (Becky, Jeff, Courtney, Sarah...).  The loyalty of many members and volutneers is commendable.

There are some wonderful teachers, too:  Dean, Daniel, Bev, Debra, Bridgett...

Great historic building, more than adequate facilities, central lcoation.



dimanche 23 août 2015

PROUD TO BE AMERICAN: A Shot, a Glimpse of an AK-47, and U.S. Servicemen Pounced on Gunman on Train to France ( NY Times, August. 23, 2015)





The limits of "diversity," Seattle-style




Diversity, unlike what the conventional wisdom dictates, means different things to different people. It does not have a fixed meaning.

Is it "true" diversity in an organization in which one racial or ethnic minority is the majority in a city which is 70% Caucasian?   Or is it evidence of budding segregation or ghettoization?

If one racial minority decries feeling like a second-class citizenship vis-a-vis another minority, will a city that prides itself on "tolerance" extend that tolerance to the first mentioned racial minority.   Will it allow individuals to express their opinion, or will it censor or even punish them for doing so?

Anglophilia is often taken as a code word for racism or white superiority, but afrophilia, widespread in Seattle and in the U.S. in general, is never decried as such.

In fact, so suggest that there is such a thing is considered racist.

Is muzzling opinion a manifestation of "diversity" and "tolerance" in Seattle rather than allowing for an open discussion of disagreement?




Here is my January 2015 review:

Ah, but underneath...up, close, and personal...from the inside

A 13-year member of the downtown YMCA--me--spills the beans.  The high incidence of theft (locker break-ins) correlates with the bullying, unspoken or explicit, that I experienced here from both members and staff.

A health club is only as good as the people that work there and the membership. 

You won't know this before you join, so I'll tell you:

PROBLEMS

(1) Cutting corners; lifeguard apathy

Lifeguards deciding that all along they had been "lenient" to swimmers over the past 8 years who swam up to the last minute before the lap session was "officially" over and that the rule all along was that swimmers had to be out of the pool area before (shower completed) that time.

I've been swimming in Seattle the last twenty years and have never had lifeguards decide that since they want to get "out of the joint" real quick, they will get everybody out of the pool before it is supposed to close (even if one of the lifeguards afterwards is supposed to be at the pool doing other things).

I've witnessed lifeguards shut down 25 minutes early because no was in the pool.

So I have complained, and occasionally something has been done.

This is what the current director calls "accomodating the special needs of individual members."  Plain weird.

(2) Tolerance of prejudice; Inequality; Ghettoization 

One of my shocking memories is taking an elevator with a fellow lap swimmer.  A lifeguard, an African-American woman, stepped in it as well.  The other swimmer, a Vietnamese-American, said "hello" to her, but the woman refused to acknowledge him and continued to talk to the white American staff person.

On the fifth floor, many white and black members form "buddy pairs" and osctracize members of other races.

When I first started going to the downtown YMCA in 2000, it looked more like Seattle:  70% white, 10% Asian, 5% black.  Now it is closer to 40% white, 40% black, 10% Asian, 5% Latino.

If you think it's cool to be around African-Americans--and many, many people do--even ones on welfare or with sketchy past histories, this gym might be an excellent fit for you.

In fact, it seems that the bigger a person's physical stature and blacker a member's skin is, the more s/he gets away with (South Asians, you don't count).  Rumour has it that a director who expelled an African-American for going on a 15-minute tirade against a man who simply asked if he could work in on a machine herself got walking papers.

Rules are selectively enforced; staff is reluctant, understandably, to confront someone much bigger than themselves and also face charges of "racism."

If you are small, unassertive or Asian-looking, and male, expect to be treated with less respect or even dumped on from low-level staff that find in you a valve for their frustrations.  If this sits well with you, this gym is for you then.  Women have it perhaps easier.

(3) Major security and safety issues

Rows and rows of storage lockers on all member floors:  regular lockers for clothes, smaller boxes for valuables, larger ones (just for gym clothes?), and still others for lab-tops on the main floor.   This, I guess, doesn't count the containers for needles in the dressing rooms.   Are we under siege?

These improvements all occurred after they brought in a new director three years ago.

I was harassed repeatedly here and all the staff could do was the next time I went to report an incident say to me, "Oh, yeah, ANOTHER incident?"

(4)  Selective application of rules.  Rules that keep getting posted for a few weeks, then taken down and replaced by new notices.  No one seems to have the same understanding of what those rules are.  The useful plaques reminding members to allow others work in on machines were inexplicably taken down a few years ago.  Most members don't know even what the rules are and many just don't care.  

(5) No water/energy conservation.  Some members take 30 minute showers (two nozzles at a time). And use a half dozen towels.

THE GOOD

(1) There are some really nice staff here (Becky, Jeff, Courtney, Sarah,...).  The loyalty of many members and, especially, volunteers (Well, if I have to shout-out, as is the contemporary custom:  Cheryl) is very commendable.  

Some wonderful teachers, too:

Thank you from the bottom of my heart, my teachers, Dean, Daniel, Bev, Debra, Bridgett...

(2) Great historic building, adequate facilities.


http://www.yelp.com/user_details?userid=zjZOOgIRvFnGAO0QQ5FNQA

jeudi 20 août 2015

Double standards and bullying




Why is an organization of 300+ people (including its Facebook "friends" and their relatives) so AFRAID of just one individual--evidently without high-profile connections that it feels it has to stomp out any traces of that person, not just at their physical headquarters but in the virtual world of the Internet as well?

Why is the truth of one person's experience viewed as such a direct threat that they feel they must, figuratively speaking, gag (or censor) that person?

What do they have to lose?

What does this say about how they respect their own "core values"?


The downtown YMCA in the person of Cynthia Klever held me responsible for the expletives I let slip--after being verbally attacked--and terminated my membership of 13 years.

And yet my posting an online review and holding the employee(s) of that organization responsible fro their conduct on July 9, 2015, has apparently raised their hackles to the point where they, or their proxies ("friends of the downtown Seattle Y") wish to deny me the right to write a review that strictly adheres to what happened that morning.

This is what I call hypocrisy--and further evidence of bullying.    An organization this size pits itself against one lone individual--whom it has already harmed--is bent on denying me freedom of expression to tell the truth.

Concealing (or denying) the conduct of a director of a large-profit such as the downtown Seattle YMCA would be irresponsible and a disservice to the community.

She should not be treating any human being, much a YMCA member, in that terrible way.

Are you glad to be part of a society, a country, and/or an organization that far from refusing to renounce Guantanamo-style interrogation actually emulates that model?    

Bring the interrogee to his or knees, Bring on Lyndee England...Break that person's spirit...






Back in 2000, before the remodel, the downtown Seattle YMCA probably had twice the number of members it has today.  (The locker and shower areas were at least twice their current size). Why has it continued to slide, especially within the past several years, downhill?


Maybe someone should look into the decline of this once vibrant health club and its transformation into a social service organization for the poor, as well as what it is like to work there (or be a member there and witness these discouraging changes), a la the recent New York Times inside look at amazon.com.